Research into music labels
The major record companies are those that have attracted the biggest music artists and who bring in the most revenue due to the amount of fans that these high profile artists have. The larger companies can also own subsidiary record companies who may be more unique and so attract different artists. There are many major record such as the Universal Music Group , Sony Music entertainment which are both located in America and EMI which is based in the UK. The bands which Universal Music Group have signed to them include huge artists such as Imagine Dragons , Jay Z, Katy Perry, Neil Diamond, Queens of the Stone Age and Will.I.am. Whilst Sony has artists such as Calvin Harris, Daft Punk , Michael Jackson , One Direction , Ozzy Osbourne , Shakira , Taylor Swift , The Script and Kings of Leon. Finally the artists that are signed to the UK company EMI are artist like The White Stripes , Snoop Dog, Gorilliaz , Blur and Robbie Williams. All of these artists are hugely popular and have very large amounts of fans and attracts large audiences which overall make more money for the record companies.
These big conglomerate record companies own many smaller record companies which can project a different image for the artists than a large company. For example with Universal Music Group they own many companies such as Def Jam Recordings which focuses on urban music, Interscope record which makes Hip Hop, and Capitol records which has a range of music from Katy Perry to the Red Hot Chillie Peppers. Sont Music Entertainment has subsidiaries such as RCA record , Epic records . Syco entertainment and Legacy recordings. Finally EMI has the subsidiary companies such as Enigma records, Gold Typhoon and EMI music Japan. These big conglomerates have only the biggest music artists who have a wide audience base and can generate lost of money for these companies. Some of the big artists that these companies have are One Direction , Rihanna, 50 cent and Coldplay and they are much bigger when compared to the independent artists.
There are many links within these companies and different forms of media. EMI has a rock magazine which it helps publish the bands that it has signed and helps bring new bands to become signed to EMI records. Furthermore EMI sponsor festivals which promote the bands which they have signed, this will help the bands become more popular and achieve more sales for there music. Additionally Sony and Universal use their connections with the other industries that they both have to increases the popularity of their signed artists .
From a music point of view it is not right that only 4 conglomerates control a huge amount of artists and the music they make. They can control what music that people listen to through ways such as TV channels and radio stations that they have connections with such as Sony entertainment , and what is mainstream for the music industry is decided by them. This is due to people buying into whatever is the most current mainstream music at the time, this means they can decide who becomes successful and who doesn't. This limits the creativity of artists as they could easily be persuaded what music to make and what not to, furthermore if they are not liked by these 4 companies it will make it much harder to become a successful artist. This makes the music industry limited and that people do not decide what they actually listen to. I believe that this limits the industry and that whoever is in favor with the companies gets to become the successful star. This makes the industry full of people who may not be the most musically talented but are backed by the companies, and so the potential of the industry is not at its best.
You cannot judge who is more successful between the independent and the large companies as they are too different. The large companies have huge amounts of money such as Universal entertainment who made $6.5 billion in 2013 whereas smaller companies have a very small amount of money to work with. Furthermore the independent companies make successful artists whilst not having the connections and the bigger corporations, this would make the more successful. However the big companies do have more money put in every project so the risk is greatly increased with each project. For example the independent companies may put £100,000 into a artists album , a bigger company may put £2 million in every project. So the companies are too different to be comparable, furthermore independent companies tend to be more focused on smaller genres rather than the mainstream music which the big companies represent. However it is the case that the smaller independent companies cannot sign big artists so what they will try to do is grow them to a size where they would be at with a conglomerate company. Although this would be a much longer process than what the conglomerates can do in that they can sign a successful artist who regulary sells records.
The independent companies bring many things that the big corporations cannot, they can make music that are niche as they can target a small audience. This makes them more likely to sell music to the audience of that genre and so they have less risk. Furthermore they can take risks as they will put less money into an artists, so they can go for artists which may be much bigger in the future as they will lose less if the gamble does not pay off. Lastly they can make any music that they wish as they are not held back as much with having to make a huge profit and pleasing shareholders, this would make them free to pick the artists they want. So in conclusion there are many advantages to the music industry with having independent companies and help the industry to become more varied and that they can help smaller artists become much bigger. Although conglomerates are just as important in that they make the highly succesfull artist as they have the financial backing to sell them to the audience.
The major record companies are those that have attracted the biggest music artists and who bring in the most revenue due to the amount of fans that these high profile artists have. The larger companies can also own subsidiary record companies who may be more unique and so attract different artists. There are many major record such as the Universal Music Group , Sony Music entertainment which are both located in America and EMI which is based in the UK. The bands which Universal Music Group have signed to them include huge artists such as Imagine Dragons , Jay Z, Katy Perry, Neil Diamond, Queens of the Stone Age and Will.I.am. Whilst Sony has artists such as Calvin Harris, Daft Punk , Michael Jackson , One Direction , Ozzy Osbourne , Shakira , Taylor Swift , The Script and Kings of Leon. Finally the artists that are signed to the UK company EMI are artist like The White Stripes , Snoop Dog, Gorilliaz , Blur and Robbie Williams. All of these artists are hugely popular and have very large amounts of fans and attracts large audiences which overall make more money for the record companies.
These big conglomerate record companies own many smaller record companies which can project a different image for the artists than a large company. For example with Universal Music Group they own many companies such as Def Jam Recordings which focuses on urban music, Interscope record which makes Hip Hop, and Capitol records which has a range of music from Katy Perry to the Red Hot Chillie Peppers. Sont Music Entertainment has subsidiaries such as RCA record , Epic records . Syco entertainment and Legacy recordings. Finally EMI has the subsidiary companies such as Enigma records, Gold Typhoon and EMI music Japan. These big conglomerates have only the biggest music artists who have a wide audience base and can generate lost of money for these companies. Some of the big artists that these companies have are One Direction , Rihanna, 50 cent and Coldplay and they are much bigger when compared to the independent artists.
There are many links within these companies and different forms of media. EMI has a rock magazine which it helps publish the bands that it has signed and helps bring new bands to become signed to EMI records. Furthermore EMI sponsor festivals which promote the bands which they have signed, this will help the bands become more popular and achieve more sales for there music. Additionally Sony and Universal use their connections with the other industries that they both have to increases the popularity of their signed artists .
Independent music labels
There are many different independent music records companies in the UK, such as 3 Beat Records, Creation Records and Mute Records. 3 Beat records was started in 1989 in Liverpool , England from a dance music record shop by Jon Barlow , Dave Nicholl and Phil Southall, and focused on dance music in the 90's. Creation Records was established in 1983 by Alan McGee , Dick Green and Joe Foster by getting a £1000 bank loan , they started the company to bring together projects that they had been working on and were nearly exclusively made up of Alternative Rock and Pop. Finally Mute records was founded in 1978 by Daniel Miller in Manchester. The label was started after Miller started recording music and getting foreign artist to perform inside the UK. They signed artist such as Depeche Mode, Erasure and Fad Gadget which are all alternative and indie rock artists , so this label specializes in the genre. These record labels cannot sign big artists so they get smaller artists and try to grow them and get artistic to try to become as big as their conglomerate signed counterparts.
From a music point of view it is not right that only 4 conglomerates control a huge amount of artists and the music they make. They can control what music that people listen to through ways such as TV channels and radio stations that they have connections with such as Sony entertainment , and what is mainstream for the music industry is decided by them. This is due to people buying into whatever is the most current mainstream music at the time, this means they can decide who becomes successful and who doesn't. This limits the creativity of artists as they could easily be persuaded what music to make and what not to, furthermore if they are not liked by these 4 companies it will make it much harder to become a successful artist. This makes the music industry limited and that people do not decide what they actually listen to. I believe that this limits the industry and that whoever is in favor with the companies gets to become the successful star. This makes the industry full of people who may not be the most musically talented but are backed by the companies, and so the potential of the industry is not at its best.
You cannot judge who is more successful between the independent and the large companies as they are too different. The large companies have huge amounts of money such as Universal entertainment who made $6.5 billion in 2013 whereas smaller companies have a very small amount of money to work with. Furthermore the independent companies make successful artists whilst not having the connections and the bigger corporations, this would make the more successful. However the big companies do have more money put in every project so the risk is greatly increased with each project. For example the independent companies may put £100,000 into a artists album , a bigger company may put £2 million in every project. So the companies are too different to be comparable, furthermore independent companies tend to be more focused on smaller genres rather than the mainstream music which the big companies represent. However it is the case that the smaller independent companies cannot sign big artists so what they will try to do is grow them to a size where they would be at with a conglomerate company. Although this would be a much longer process than what the conglomerates can do in that they can sign a successful artist who regulary sells records.
The independent companies bring many things that the big corporations cannot, they can make music that are niche as they can target a small audience. This makes them more likely to sell music to the audience of that genre and so they have less risk. Furthermore they can take risks as they will put less money into an artists, so they can go for artists which may be much bigger in the future as they will lose less if the gamble does not pay off. Lastly they can make any music that they wish as they are not held back as much with having to make a huge profit and pleasing shareholders, this would make them free to pick the artists they want. So in conclusion there are many advantages to the music industry with having independent companies and help the industry to become more varied and that they can help smaller artists become much bigger. Although conglomerates are just as important in that they make the highly succesfull artist as they have the financial backing to sell them to the audience.